Jurgen habermas recognition of the postsecular has impacted the debate. The article investigates the encounter between joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas in munich 2004. For this english version i omitted those parts of my analysis of apels philosophy. Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkerstheologian and churchman joseph ratzinger, now pope benedict xvi, and jrgen habermas, philosopher and neomarxist social criticdiscuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. The page citations given in parentheses refer to the german edn. Habermas warns about external threats to secular society. The event was widely regarded as a conversation about the topic the prepolitical moral foundations of a liberal state.
Habermas is a german philosopher the leading systematic philosopher of our time, richard rorty of the university of virginia calls him. Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional state. These two separate essays are the summation of a discussion between these two men. Habermas argues that his speech disability made him think differently about the importance of deep dependence and of communication. His diagnoses of contemporary society and concepts such as the public sphere, communicative rationality, and cosmopolitanism have influenced virtually all academic disciplines, spurred political debates, and shaped intellectual life in germany and beyond for more than fifty years. Joseph cardinal ratzinger and jurgen habermas met in munich on the. It does not deal with his older attempt at an epistemological justi. The habermasratzinger debate and its implications for europe.
Once citizens act in my take on the habermas ratzinger debate. Their contributions showed broad agreement on the role of religion in todays western secular state and areas of collaboration and mutual enrichment between modernity and christianity in europe and elsewhere. Ratzingers logos theology and the healing of human rights. Habermas was born in gummersbach, rhine province, in 1929.
This short work is their take on the interctions of democratic culture, political liberalism, religion and god. Like kant, habermas views faith as a complement to reason, not as its basis. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide january 29, 2011 january 29, 2011 ricardo s. In both he sees no less than the prototypes of a decisive dialogue in our day which will shape the future of our world p. Habermas has put forth a communicativebased alternative to traditional forms of ethics that require recourse to history or tradition or to an authoritative document.
Ratzinger, the will be pope benedict xvi, maintains that christianity plays decisive and significant role in the making of european culture. In public and in print, he even debated the philosopher jurgen habermas on. Because when an exchange as habermas proposes really begins to take plac. Chapter 4 is a translation of einen unbedingten inn zu retten ohne gott, ist eitel. Contributors to the volume respond both to habermas s ambitious and welldeveloped philosophical project and to his most recent work on religion. The developments in rortys position are pointed out, for example, his current acceptance of the epithet relativist against his earlier rejection of this self. In terms of range and depth there is no one close to him.
In conside thre deeper presentatio o similaf n theme r i habermasns the theorys of. Habermas, ratzinger and the kantian divide creatio. Then, habermas s theory of discourse ethics is introduced and explicated. The essays in this book all of them published here for the first time provide. Key concepts barbara fultner a rare systematic thinker, habermas has furthered our understanding of modernity, social interaction and linguistic practice, societal institutions, rationality, morality, the law, globalization, and the role of religion in multicultural societies. This thesis will seek to determine whether habermass theory, called the theory of discourse ethics, is an ethical theory that is appropriate or applicable for use within. Thus, adorno was ultimately able to bestow the crown of legitimate succession on the person who he thought was the most deserving and capable critical theorist wiggershaus 1996.
Firstly, it extends the understanding of ratzinger as the author of a logos theology. The debate between habermas and luhmann goes back to the end of the 1960sa time. Studies in contemporary german social thought includes three essays that were published in erlauterungen zur diskursethik. In this chapter the debate between habermas and rorty on the issue of relativism is discussed critically. Habermas ratzinger jurgen habermas pope benedict xvi. And while ratzinger precisely dialogues with habermas because of what he advocates for, making the religious feel at home in the modern state, he will also say that this is inadequate or insufficient. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion cambridge core. Article information, pdf download for how religious is the public sphere. Habermas and ratzinger dialectics of secularization notes. Soon afterward, the disciples were discouraged, bereaved, and despondent, having lost hope.
Article information, pdf download for liberalism ex nihilo. Communal values in the new hungarian fundamental law. I have talked about the two intellectual giants on a previous post. Teoria critica y estado social neokantismo y socialdemocracia en j. Habermas and religion calhoun, craig j habermas, jurgen. Habermas, the last great representative of the philosophical school of frankfurt and the esteemed counterpart of thencardinal ratzinger in the debate that took place in munich on january 19, 2004, revived the proposal for an alliance between enlightened reason, or the clarified consciousness of modernity, and the. Habermas, 1981 kleine politische schriften, suhrkamp, frankfurt am main, p. The result is a guide for those seeking to understand and build on an unfinished debate between two of the 20th centurys most important philosophers. As i indicate below, habermas developed his study within the context of the. The focus of this lecture is the habermas and ratzinger debate in munich, at the invitation of the catholic academy of bavaria, on january 19, 2004. Religion and democracy in the thought of jurgen habermas. He was born with a cleft palate and had corrective surgery twice during childhood. Get your kindle here, or download a free kindle reading app.
Habermas and ratzinger now benedict xvi are two of the greatest minds of their times. Habermas essay, taking aim at the heart of the present 1984 was altered before release in order to account for foucaults inability to reply. The debate which later became a book, published in various languages both habermas and ratzinger like bockenforde before them. Thompson is a fellow of jesus college, cambridge, and david held is lecturer in politics, university of york. In 2004 jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger participated on a debate on the. A few phases can be distinguished in his intellectual and scientific development, namely, speculative. Jurgen habermas is one of the most influential philosophers of our time. Habermas returned to frankfurt to take over horkheimers chair in philosophy and sociology. For habermas, central to any philosophical activity is a setting he calls the ideal speech situation, and this habermasian notion brings us back to the discourse of. Critical commentaries on habermas have often treated the public sphere as a. Download pdf save cite this item table of contents.
Foucault and habermas did not actually debate in person, though they were considering a formal one in the u. On these occasions i have also provided the reference to the original texts. In the most recent publication by pope benedict xvi, which is actually a collection of interviews by peter seewald called light of the world, german philosopher jurgen habermas is mentioned once again. The book closes with an extended response from habermas itself a major statement from one of todays most important thinkers. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on amazon. For, on one hand, it is true that foucault is as we all must be, particularly 289 king. Post secular we realize we have secularized too much, and we have lost some of the basic communal morality that derived from religion ie forgiveness, social programs, redemption, sense of communal help 1. The theory of communicative action belongs to the set of modern postmarxist theories. Ratzinger rehearses the debate from the euthyphro on the.
The analysis of a fascinating habermasratzinger debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of the freestate suggests that while legitimacy originates on the will of the citizens that conform the political community, liberal democracies might not be. In his thinking after the formal debates with luhmann, habermas has developed his thought in many ways. Jan 29, 2011 sorry i only approved your comment now, and responded so late. The editors have also contributed a substantial introduction outlining the central contours of habermas s work and summarizing the main arguments of the essays. Secularizing promotes focus on individual selfgain, yet this can go too extreme 1. Justification and application remarks on discourse ethics. This is the full text of a chapter on the habermas rawls debate which was written as chapter 1 of the rouledeg companion to critical theory. Debate habermas ratzinger pdf the dialectics of secularization. Habermas investigated both the ways that a new public sphere emerged during the time of the enlightenment and the american and french revolutions and how it promoted political discussion and debate. Over the last week i have been struggling to understand the basic architecture of german philosopher jurgen habermas, perhaps the most famous philosopher of his generation. All quotations have been rendered in english by the. The context is the question about the relevance of faith to modern life, an issue which both ratzinger and habermas have been and are engaging carefully. His work addresses communicative rationality and the public sphere associated with the frankfurt school, habermass work focuses on the foundations of epistemology and social.
Abstract taking the use of the logos in ratzingers regensburg lecture as its starting point, the thesis expands three horizons in ratzinger studies. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on free shipping on qualifying offers. In 2004 jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger participated on a debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of a freestate. But habermas comes to this debate as much more than just a philosopher. This thesis culminates with an examination of the appropriateness and applicability of habermas s theory of discourse ethics for the development of a contemporary christian ethic. In both he sees no less than the prototypes of a decisive dialogue in. Although it does not provide a comprehensive overview of every aspect of habermass critical theory, it does situate the idea of the public sphere, which occupied him early on in his career, in the context of subsequent developments in his thinking. Jan 19, 2019 habermas stands as a symbol of continuity with the platonic tradition, which operates through dialogue, such as the ones conducted by socrates and reconstructed by plato.
A critical engagement with the regensburg lecture by francis mohan a thesis submitted to the university of birmingham for the degree of doctor of philosophy department of theology and religion school of philosophy, theology and religion college of arts and law university of birmingham. Lessons from the jurgen habermas and joseph ratzinger debate, fellowship of catholic scholars quarterly, nos. Restricting the growth of monetaryadministrative complexity is by no means. First, he grounds the necessity and authority of rules on the three speech claims of truth, truthfulness, and rightness. The analysis of a fascinating habermasratzinger debate on the prepolitical moral foundations of the freestate suggests that while legitimacy originates on the will of the citizens that conform the political community, liberal democracies might not be completely free from moral principles implicit in their political culture. In this part of the paper, some of the basic insights of the habermas ratzinger dialogue habermas ratzinger 2005 will be cited, where both protagonists tend to answer the question in the same way. The editors have also contributed a substantial introduction outlining the central contours of habermass work and summarizing the main arguments of the essays. Gary habermas 12 minimal facts approach will helps us validate key events of the life of jesus. Secondly, it shows how the regensburg theme of the full. Jurgen habermas translated by thomas mccarthy beacon press boston. So we have to concentrate to this tradition as it follows the distinctive signature of habermas in the critical theory of society.
Its author is jurgen habermas 1929, the german philosopher and sociologist who pertains to the second generation of the frankfurt philosophical circle. On reason and religion joseph ratzinger, jurgen habermas on. The debate was a dialogue between texts and followers. Contributors to the volume respond both to habermass ambitious and welldeveloped philosophical project and to his most recent work on religion. On reason and religion on free shipping on qualifying offers. The rortyhabermas debate a companion to rorty wiley. Prepolitical foundations of the democratic constitutional. Feb 19, 2011 i find it significant that habermas speaks about the sensitivity to the truth as a necessary element of the process of political argumentation, reinserting thus the concept of truth into the philosophical debate and into the political debate. The book juxtaposes key texts from foucault and habermas. The debate between habermas and luhmann goes back to the end of the 1960sa time of extreme ideological confrontation in the fields of social science and philosophy. The debate compares and evaluates the central ideas of habermas and foucault as they pertain to questions of power, reason, ethics. The major figure on the other side of this debate is jurgen habermas. Habermas and ratzinger on the future of religion ratzinger is the personi. The present work does not examine all of habermass writings.
1015 1041 1420 779 998 863 520 507 1577 790 2 615 1460 1341 166 1064 1587 136 771 1013 695 548 787 212 1027 1199 321 265 1047 1498 713 1354 675 1211 244